Quantcast

1.4 vs 1.6

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

1.4 vs 1.6

Simon Greener
> I'm not seeing a huge benefit to moving to using generics etc. There's
> also a large amount of work to move everying to generics, I think.
> There's also a downside to moving, which is that people running 1.1-1.4
> will no longer be able to use the library. (Don't laugh - I have at
> least one client who is still using 1.4)
>
> What do others on the list think?

I am still using 1.4 as one of my target applications into which I deploy my application runs 1.4 and this application will continue to receive support until 2013.

regards
Simon
--
SpatialDB Advice and Design, Solutions Architecture and Programming,
Oracle Database 10g Administrator Certified Associate; Oracle Database 10g SQL Certified Professional
Oracle Spatial, SQL Server, PostGIS, MySQL, ArcSDE, Manifold GIS, Radius Topology and Studio Specialist.
39 Cliff View Drive, Allens Rivulet, 7150, Tasmania, Australia.
Website: www.spatialdbadvisor.com
  Email: [hidden email]
  Voice: +613 9016 3910
Mobile: +61 418 396391
Skype: sggreener
Longitude: 147.20515 (147° 12' 18" E)
Latitude: -43.01530 (43° 00' 55" S)
NAC:W80CK 7SWP3
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
Loading...